ALBERT CARL OTTO v. STATE OF MARYLAND

Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Videotaped interview Albert Carl Otto, IV was convicted of raping his girlfriend. Otto alleges that the trial court erroneously admitted a videotaped interview with their daughter and recorded phone calls with his mother into evidence, and erroneously instructed the jury. Read the opinion here:

from http://thedailyrecord.com/2017/07/05/albert-carl-otto-v-state-of-maryland/

Advertisements

Author: Baltimore Checkbook

Best in consumer news and deals in Baltimore, MD.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s